<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes (Mute sound first!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-37080</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-37080</guid>
		<description>does anyone know anywhere one actually can view the mentioned 9000 fossils which would go some way to backing up this video? i have looked on the internet but not found anything of that order.

&lt;strong&gt;-  they&#039;re not all in one place.But the Natural History has a fair few - Phillis&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know anywhere one actually can view the mentioned 9000 fossils which would go some way to backing up this video? i have looked on the internet but not found anything of that order.</p>
<p><strong>-  they&#8217;re not all in one place.But the Natural History has a fair few &#8211; Phillis</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MR Dukey</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15563</link>
		<dc:creator>MR Dukey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15563</guid>
		<description>I got no problem with evolution but this video is bogus. You expect me to believe there are over 120000 generations in this video or is it simply a CARTOON?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got no problem with evolution but this video is bogus. You expect me to believe there are over 120000 generations in this video or is it simply a CARTOON?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15269</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15269</guid>
		<description>@flapjack unfortunately doing it with every fossil we have still won&#039;t convince creationists, who will merely ask for the intermediate stages between each sample you have.  Creationists will not be convinced until we can provide fossils from every generation to them, which for obvious reasons is impossible.  Palaeontologists ruefully acknowledge this when they discover something that the press hails as &quot;the missing link&quot; - the message sent is usually &quot;congratulations, you&#039;ve just identified two new gaps in the fossil record.&quot;

@Chris Bertschy - you&#039;re almost right, but not for the reasons you think.  The creationist argument that &quot;if we evolved from apes, why are they still around&quot; arises from the fundamental misconception that we evolved from the same species of apes we have now.  We didn&#039;t.  Man did not evolve from chimps, gorillas, orangutans or any other of the extant ape species.  We like they, evolved from common ancestors.  There was no direct change from chimpanzee to man, rather there was a change from some common ancestor, and over time the chimpanzees and the homo sapiens became very distinct, but neither led into the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@flapjack unfortunately doing it with every fossil we have still won&#8217;t convince creationists, who will merely ask for the intermediate stages between each sample you have.  Creationists will not be convinced until we can provide fossils from every generation to them, which for obvious reasons is impossible.  Palaeontologists ruefully acknowledge this when they discover something that the press hails as &#8220;the missing link&#8221; &#8211; the message sent is usually &#8220;congratulations, you&#8217;ve just identified two new gaps in the fossil record.&#8221;</p>
<p>@Chris Bertschy &#8211; you&#8217;re almost right, but not for the reasons you think.  The creationist argument that &#8220;if we evolved from apes, why are they still around&#8221; arises from the fundamental misconception that we evolved from the same species of apes we have now.  We didn&#8217;t.  Man did not evolve from chimps, gorillas, orangutans or any other of the extant ape species.  We like they, evolved from common ancestors.  There was no direct change from chimpanzee to man, rather there was a change from some common ancestor, and over time the chimpanzees and the homo sapiens became very distinct, but neither led into the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15264</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15264</guid>
		<description>Chris Bertschy... if you made a video showing a ford escort morphing into a human, that wouldn&#039;t invalidate the premise of the video, it would solidify it.

You should really read the sidebar to it. It&#039;s very informative.

The video isn&#039;t presented to be an accurate representation of our own lineage. It&#039;s meant to illustrate (what many creationists can&#039;t seem to understand) that micro changes, can culminate in &quot;macro&quot; results. That there is no distinction between the two in Science. Macro, is just what you call micro after a lot of it has occurred. It&#039;s what you call seconds, once they turn into minutes.

That&#039;s what the video was illustrating. How a little bit of change over a long period of time, can culminate in very long chances, at no point in which can you ever object to the transition in the next frame. That&#039;s the point.

Morphing a man into a dog or any of the likes wouldn&#039;t invalidate the video... it&#039;s precisely the point of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Bertschy&#8230; if you made a video showing a ford escort morphing into a human, that wouldn&#8217;t invalidate the premise of the video, it would solidify it.</p>
<p>You should really read the sidebar to it. It&#8217;s very informative.</p>
<p>The video isn&#8217;t presented to be an accurate representation of our own lineage. It&#8217;s meant to illustrate (what many creationists can&#8217;t seem to understand) that micro changes, can culminate in &#8220;macro&#8221; results. That there is no distinction between the two in Science. Macro, is just what you call micro after a lot of it has occurred. It&#8217;s what you call seconds, once they turn into minutes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what the video was illustrating. How a little bit of change over a long period of time, can culminate in very long chances, at no point in which can you ever object to the transition in the next frame. That&#8217;s the point.</p>
<p>Morphing a man into a dog or any of the likes wouldn&#8217;t invalidate the video&#8230; it&#8217;s precisely the point of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bertschy</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15259</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bertschy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15259</guid>
		<description>So then why are there still apes (almost identical to the original stills)?  Wait, I know.  Because there has always been a difference between apes and man.  Who ever posted that every still was based on a complete fossil record is ignorant.  There currently is no complete fossil record from Australopithecus to Homo Sapiens.  Filling in the gaps with B.S. is bad science.  Give me five minutes with photoshop and I will illustrate how we clearly evolved from a ford escort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then why are there still apes (almost identical to the original stills)?  Wait, I know.  Because there has always been a difference between apes and man.  Who ever posted that every still was based on a complete fossil record is ignorant.  There currently is no complete fossil record from Australopithecus to Homo Sapiens.  Filling in the gaps with B.S. is bad science.  Give me five minutes with photoshop and I will illustrate how we clearly evolved from a ford escort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes &#124; chavansoft</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15238</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes &#124; chavansoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15238</guid>
		<description>[...] Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes (Via Daily Grail) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes (Via Daily Grail) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nopke</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15213</link>
		<dc:creator>Nopke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15213</guid>
		<description>The thing that I like best is to play it fast ... The music .. never heard of it nor the singer I guess ... am not sure whether it is a professional .. it sort of does have potential but needs still some work .. 

Am I a homo sapiens? Cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that I like best is to play it fast &#8230; The music .. never heard of it nor the singer I guess &#8230; am not sure whether it is a professional .. it sort of does have potential but needs still some work .. </p>
<p>Am I a homo sapiens? Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrG</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15210</link>
		<dc:creator>mrG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15210</guid>
		<description>Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was very well acquainted with this sequence ... and he was a Jesuit.  So there goes THAT theory.  The song is clearly cheesy, whatever its purpose, and it is compressed and enhanced with studio-voodoo audio-enhancers beyond all recognition of anything &#039;musical&#039;, and its on that grounds, and the injected &quot;Marco Polo&quot; cryptoquip that really makes me see the zealots of Scientism as no better than the PTL-Club and their 1-800 prayer lines.  Sorry.  

If science was what we want to present, then we should present the science, and the core video buried under the lame rhetoric is absolutely brilliant, but I would never show it to anyone, not unless I could find the original un-slanted (and I suspect the authors of that were not the politicos who posted this junky pitch) As Joe Friday would say, &quot;Just the facts, ma&#039;am.&quot;   

The facts will speak for themselves. Let&#039;s leave the snake-oil pitch to the carney barkers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was very well acquainted with this sequence &#8230; and he was a Jesuit.  So there goes THAT theory.  The song is clearly cheesy, whatever its purpose, and it is compressed and enhanced with studio-voodoo audio-enhancers beyond all recognition of anything &#8216;musical&#8217;, and its on that grounds, and the injected &#8220;Marco Polo&#8221; cryptoquip that really makes me see the zealots of Scientism as no better than the PTL-Club and their 1-800 prayer lines.  Sorry.  </p>
<p>If science was what we want to present, then we should present the science, and the core video buried under the lame rhetoric is absolutely brilliant, but I would never show it to anyone, not unless I could find the original un-slanted (and I suspect the authors of that were not the politicos who posted this junky pitch) As Joe Friday would say, &#8220;Just the facts, ma&#8217;am.&#8221;   </p>
<p>The facts will speak for themselves. Let&#8217;s leave the snake-oil pitch to the carney barkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes &#124; Design Website</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15205</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes &#124; Design Website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15205</guid>
		<description>[...] fossil evidence – shoved in to a computer and animated together. It’s fantastic to watch.     Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes (Via Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fossil evidence – shoved in to a computer and animated together. It’s fantastic to watch.     Video: from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens in 5 minutes (Via Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fosca</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/07/australopithecus-homo-sapiens-5-minutes-mute-sound/#comment-15030</link>
		<dc:creator>Fosca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=3574#comment-15030</guid>
		<description>I feel like I&#039;m getting snarked at because the answers too all of this are obvious to anyone that has studied, but the point really is that people who think that the answer to everything is simply that &#039;God did it&#039; won&#039;t have studied, so these vids don&#039;t do anything at all to challenge the notions of people that struggle with the theory of evolution. 

So yeah, I get a kick out of seeing the skull evolve, but...well everything Flapjack already said. 

But just so&#039;s nobody misunderstands me, I&#039;m playing for the team here! I come to this blog because I&#039;m on board, I&#039;m not trying to rock anyone&#039;s boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I&#8217;m getting snarked at because the answers too all of this are obvious to anyone that has studied, but the point really is that people who think that the answer to everything is simply that &#8216;God did it&#8217; won&#8217;t have studied, so these vids don&#8217;t do anything at all to challenge the notions of people that struggle with the theory of evolution. </p>
<p>So yeah, I get a kick out of seeing the skull evolve, but&#8230;well everything Flapjack already said. </p>
<p>But just so&#8217;s nobody misunderstands me, I&#8217;m playing for the team here! I come to this blog because I&#8217;m on board, I&#8217;m not trying to rock anyone&#8217;s boat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

