Comments on: WIKIPEDIA VS. PORTRAIT GALLERY: THE LINE IS CROSSED

By: Ms G

Ms G — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:10:41 +0000

Say, erm … can’t you push up the resolution a bit of those images in the gallery here … My eyes can not see them so properly .. (nah, does not have to do anything ofcourse with printing and such .. nothing at all ..).

So, may wikipedia put Brown’s pics up there, the digital thumb nails? Just wondering.

By: Ms G

Ms G — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:07:10 +0000

Oh yes, selfish .. selfish …. We can’t all go in masses through the tunnel or on the planes .. you wont like that ..

Hm, if all musea start to claim copyright on digital images … number visitors musea will go down fast I guess .. they should have seen upon it a bit more as free publicity.

Let’s check if Brown’s images online here give a message (not allowed to copy …)

By: Tash

Tash — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:31:20 +0000

NPG* – it’s to early!

By: Tash

Tash — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:30:07 +0000

Will have a look in a while -but if Derren’s Art is the NPA i’m with them

By: Jacqueenking

Jacqueenking — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:02:25 +0000

Yaaaay, what a buzz. I had to buy the expensive catalogue to look at them previously, as travelling to London by train is costly, and no time to do it. Thanks for the heads up Phillis you star.

By: ReliegiousMarie

ReliegiousMarie — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:08:33 +0000

Oh eh ah oeh…so happyy…I have none of the 1000 portraits on my harddisk now ….nope…

By: amanda

amanda — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:24:14 +0000

by the way – i looked and wow wow wow what a blast!

By: amanda

amanda — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:23:29 +0000

similar but different http://www.projectgutenberg.org