<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How psychology can help the planet stay cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 80s Craig</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20402</link>
		<dc:creator>80s Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20402</guid>
		<description>Slightly off topic, Teller put a good link on twitter this week, which made a very good point about Earth / rainfall / water shortage (which is sort-of global warming related!) 

I&#039;m not going to repost the youtube link, because the video also involved a man vomiting a gallon of milk at the end, but he essentially said that as the Earth is a closed system, and water cannot escape, when people complain that it isn&#039;t raining enough it&#039;s because people aren&#039;t using enough water to start with.  The more we water our lawns, the more will evaporate and the more rain it will create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off topic, Teller put a good link on twitter this week, which made a very good point about Earth / rainfall / water shortage (which is sort-of global warming related!) </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to repost the youtube link, because the video also involved a man vomiting a gallon of milk at the end, but he essentially said that as the Earth is a closed system, and water cannot escape, when people complain that it isn&#8217;t raining enough it&#8217;s because people aren&#8217;t using enough water to start with.  The more we water our lawns, the more will evaporate and the more rain it will create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20399</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20399</guid>
		<description>@Richard - not to mention the dreaded Global Cooling: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard &#8211; not to mention the dreaded Global Cooling: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling</a> <img src='http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nopke</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20377</link>
		<dc:creator>Nopke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20377</guid>
		<description>Ha, there is an even simpler focus ... the rich people .. the people with too much money on their hands ..... the ones who often boosts those campaigns and such e.g. ... they theirselves dont change their life at all.
They are responsible ... the others can not even afford to buy all that stuff that might trigger global warming.

And also, governments like to boost economy theirselves .. put money in companies .. put it on higher priority than citizins ... (I mean .. what crisis????? A lot of companies used that excuse for their own bad insight and greediness ....) and those companies only come up with stuff that is of worse quality ... the throw away society ... Whereas it annoys consumers .. a lot at least, with time. 

The focus should be on the producers ofcourse ... where else?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, there is an even simpler focus &#8230; the rich people .. the people with too much money on their hands &#8230;.. the ones who often boosts those campaigns and such e.g. &#8230; they theirselves dont change their life at all.<br />
They are responsible &#8230; the others can not even afford to buy all that stuff that might trigger global warming.</p>
<p>And also, governments like to boost economy theirselves .. put money in companies .. put it on higher priority than citizins &#8230; (I mean .. what crisis????? A lot of companies used that excuse for their own bad insight and greediness &#8230;.) and those companies only come up with stuff that is of worse quality &#8230; the throw away society &#8230; Whereas it annoys consumers .. a lot at least, with time. </p>
<p>The focus should be on the producers ofcourse &#8230; where else?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20367</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20367</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that most of the strategies for reducing global warming have other advantages too for, amongst others, health and finances - better to stress these to counteract intertia. 

Addiotionally, I remember the &quot;doomsday&quot; predicitons of the early seventies, where by 1980 we would all undoubtedly be dying from pesticide usage and pollution, no wonder we of a certain age carry a certain scepticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that most of the strategies for reducing global warming have other advantages too for, amongst others, health and finances &#8211; better to stress these to counteract intertia. </p>
<p>Addiotionally, I remember the &#8220;doomsday&#8221; predicitons of the early seventies, where by 1980 we would all undoubtedly be dying from pesticide usage and pollution, no wonder we of a certain age carry a certain scepticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tash</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20316</link>
		<dc:creator>Tash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20316</guid>
		<description>lol - the council doesn&#039;t give u much choice about being green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol &#8211; the council doesn&#8217;t give u much choice about being green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20315</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20315</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m quite surprised no-one has looked into targeted campaigns before - advertisers have long since targeted specific demographics.

Many people I know (myself included) maintain doubts that humans can actually slow down &quot;global warming&quot; - there are lots of evidence-based arguments for and against humanities effect on the planet&#039;s CO2 levels... and even whether CO2 levels are the cause of (or caused by) global temperature changes.

But, I still recycle as much a possible (over 90% of our household waste), use energy saving products wherever possible, and source produce from as close to home as possible.  Not to reduce my &quot;carbon footprint&quot;, but because I genuinely believe we can&#039;t keep extracting natural reserves (which take millions of years to develop)

and burying our man-made non-decomposable materials which take thousands of years to decompose.  It&#039;s simple logic - instead of throwing away the old, and making new stuff, we could make resources last much longer (and cheaper) by recycling materials which can be reused.

So, in my own way, i am &quot;reducing my carbon footprint&quot;, but not to slow global warming, but to conserve resources.  Tell that to the global-warming cynics, and they might just see your point.

Here&#039;s a controversial thought: we should use MORE plastic packaging.  Plastic can be recycled far more efficiently than glass or, paper, and allows produce to be stored more efficiently, saving energy and reducing spoils.  Glass and paper is barely worth recycling at the moment for the energy it saves.

- Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m quite surprised no-one has looked into targeted campaigns before &#8211; advertisers have long since targeted specific demographics.</p>
<p>Many people I know (myself included) maintain doubts that humans can actually slow down &#8220;global warming&#8221; &#8211; there are lots of evidence-based arguments for and against humanities effect on the planet&#8217;s CO2 levels&#8230; and even whether CO2 levels are the cause of (or caused by) global temperature changes.</p>
<p>But, I still recycle as much a possible (over 90% of our household waste), use energy saving products wherever possible, and source produce from as close to home as possible.  Not to reduce my &#8220;carbon footprint&#8221;, but because I genuinely believe we can&#8217;t keep extracting natural reserves (which take millions of years to develop)</p>
<p>and burying our man-made non-decomposable materials which take thousands of years to decompose.  It&#8217;s simple logic &#8211; instead of throwing away the old, and making new stuff, we could make resources last much longer (and cheaper) by recycling materials which can be reused.</p>
<p>So, in my own way, i am &#8220;reducing my carbon footprint&#8221;, but not to slow global warming, but to conserve resources.  Tell that to the global-warming cynics, and they might just see your point.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a controversial thought: we should use MORE plastic packaging.  Plastic can be recycled far more efficiently than glass or, paper, and allows produce to be stored more efficiently, saving energy and reducing spoils.  Glass and paper is barely worth recycling at the moment for the energy it saves.</p>
<p>- Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/08/psychology-planet-stay-cool/#comment-20307</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=5413#comment-20307</guid>
		<description>Or teach people to be more responsible and stop waiting for some one else to do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or teach people to be more responsible and stop waiting for some one else to do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

