<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fossils Push Back Earliest Complex Animals 40 Million Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burntbroccoli</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/#comment-34803</link>
		<dc:creator>Burntbroccoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=7421#comment-34803</guid>
		<description>I myself am very much like a living quilt or mattress.

Why do scientists say things like &quot;It was only during the Cambrian that animals developed...&quot; it just jarrs my ears so badly, I&#039;ve heard them do it with &#039;jurassic&#039; as well. It always feels like they should append &quot;era&quot; or &quot;age&quot;. I&#039;m sure they used to. If an age was called Smith, and they said &quot;it was only during the Smith that animals...&quot; that would be so wrong, surely.
I&#039;m probably wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself am very much like a living quilt or mattress.</p>
<p>Why do scientists say things like &#8220;It was only during the Cambrian that animals developed&#8230;&#8221; it just jarrs my ears so badly, I&#8217;ve heard them do it with &#8216;jurassic&#8217; as well. It always feels like they should append &#8220;era&#8221; or &#8220;age&#8221;. I&#8217;m sure they used to. If an age was called Smith, and they said &#8220;it was only during the Smith that animals&#8230;&#8221; that would be so wrong, surely.<br />
I&#8217;m probably wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms G</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/#comment-34779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=7421#comment-34779</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t they put some figure legends in there? 

That&#039;s where we came from then huh? In a way. And even that is already a highly complex form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t they put some figure legends in there? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s where we came from then huh? In a way. And even that is already a highly complex form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tash</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/#comment-34723</link>
		<dc:creator>Tash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=7421#comment-34723</guid>
		<description>Picture A looks like a close up ofa fossilised fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture A looks like a close up ofa fossilised fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criss</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/#comment-34720</link>
		<dc:creator>criss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=7421#comment-34720</guid>
		<description>@MarkEMarkEMark: Your brain is a 40 million yr old rock that once resembled some form of life? 

It looks like a malteser with the chocolate bitten off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MarkEMarkEMark: Your brain is a 40 million yr old rock that once resembled some form of life? </p>
<p>It looks like a malteser with the chocolate bitten off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayKay</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/#comment-34718</link>
		<dc:creator>JayKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=7421#comment-34718</guid>
		<description>A broccoli scan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A broccoli scan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkEMarkEMark</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/10/fossils-push-earliest-complex-animals-40-million-years/#comment-34700</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkEMarkEMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=7421#comment-34700</guid>
		<description>You posted a picture of a brain scan by mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You posted a picture of a brain scan by mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

