<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sixty 3,000 Year Old Headless Skeletons Discovered in Pacific Ocean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/12/sixty-3000-year-headless-skeletons-discovered-pacific-ocean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/12/sixty-3000-year-headless-skeletons-discovered-pacific-ocean/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CasualDoc</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/12/sixty-3000-year-headless-skeletons-discovered-pacific-ocean/#comment-49055</link>
		<dc:creator>CasualDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=8730#comment-49055</guid>
		<description>Headless skeletons? so what&#039;s that picture then? unless I am very much mistaken it is a skull!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headless skeletons? so what&#8217;s that picture then? unless I am very much mistaken it is a skull!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Claire</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/12/sixty-3000-year-headless-skeletons-discovered-pacific-ocean/#comment-48885</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=8730#comment-48885</guid>
		<description>Oh, how nice....I&#039;ve got images of these poor people being left around until little enough of them was left before being snapped &amp; shoved around to fit into their final resting place (if you can call it that).
Still, 3,000 years old?  I really think that&#039;s fascinating finding the remains of a human who lived back then.

I always remember a fascinating programme I saw on the &#039;tattooed lady&#039; who was discovered in ice (similarly, she was thousands of years old) and was so beautifully preserved, even her hair was intact.  She had all of these tattoos over her arms &amp; hands, like she was some sort of warrior.  Really was so incredibly interesting.

LC x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, how nice&#8230;.I&#8217;ve got images of these poor people being left around until little enough of them was left before being snapped &#038; shoved around to fit into their final resting place (if you can call it that).<br />
Still, 3,000 years old?  I really think that&#8217;s fascinating finding the remains of a human who lived back then.</p>
<p>I always remember a fascinating programme I saw on the &#8216;tattooed lady&#8217; who was discovered in ice (similarly, she was thousands of years old) and was so beautifully preserved, even her hair was intact.  She had all of these tattoos over her arms &#038; hands, like she was some sort of warrior.  Really was so incredibly interesting.</p>
<p>LC x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms G</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2009/12/sixty-3000-year-headless-skeletons-discovered-pacific-ocean/#comment-48865</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=8730#comment-48865</guid>
		<description>Hm .. without the head ... 5 skulls on one skeleton...  I wonder what type of reasoning was behind this .. Did they see different upon the mind than on the body ... and if so, in what way. The fact that 5 have been found on one skeleton ... for company? Protection? What power is in those skulls then? And why would they want to protect the skeleton, or give it company or whatever if the whole self would have been in the skull. Evil spiritis in either skull or skeleton that killed them? Or did they all become mentally ill by the end and was this a way to heal them (not very likely I&#039;d say).  
Skulls of your family in your house .... so that they are still there with you ... my ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm .. without the head &#8230; 5 skulls on one skeleton&#8230;  I wonder what type of reasoning was behind this .. Did they see different upon the mind than on the body &#8230; and if so, in what way. The fact that 5 have been found on one skeleton &#8230; for company? Protection? What power is in those skulls then? And why would they want to protect the skeleton, or give it company or whatever if the whole self would have been in the skull. Evil spiritis in either skull or skeleton that killed them? Or did they all become mentally ill by the end and was this a way to heal them (not very likely I&#8217;d say).<br />
Skulls of your family in your house &#8230;. so that they are still there with you &#8230; my &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

