<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Do Atheists Come From?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: orich</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-95358</link>
		<dc:creator>orich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-95358</guid>
		<description>&quot;After all, atheism is the natural stance of the educated and the informed, is it not?&quot;

The simple answer to that question is no. I would say it is the uneducated and uniformed who do not believe in God, and the same goes for many of those in the so-called mainstream religions who atheists often debate and have problems with. Unfortunately if the bible is meant to be the word of God and you dilute it so much with human ideology, philosophy and interpretation especially to promote doctrine. Then much like dilute orange squash not only does it lose the strength it is meant to have, it becomes weak and unpalatable. The sort of arguments those representing the bible often use in defence of their beliefs, its no wonder people are leaving religious beliefs behind with such erroneous fallacies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After all, atheism is the natural stance of the educated and the informed, is it not?&#8221;</p>
<p>The simple answer to that question is no. I would say it is the uneducated and uniformed who do not believe in God, and the same goes for many of those in the so-called mainstream religions who atheists often debate and have problems with. Unfortunately if the bible is meant to be the word of God and you dilute it so much with human ideology, philosophy and interpretation especially to promote doctrine. Then much like dilute orange squash not only does it lose the strength it is meant to have, it becomes weak and unpalatable. The sort of arguments those representing the bible often use in defence of their beliefs, its no wonder people are leaving religious beliefs behind with such erroneous fallacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuke</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-54470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-54470</guid>
		<description>People can believe anything they want.  I can believe that Penelope Cruz is heartbroken I haven&#039;t called her.  What you really need to ask is it true?  As scholars more worldly then me have stated for centuries, we do not have to prove that God does not exist, (can&#039;t prove a negative).  What we need to do is have someone take the time to prove God does exist.  That is hypothesis that needs to be tested.  When there is proof of God&#039;s existance (good luck finding any) then the dialogue can begin.  But so what, any social contract we have with others in our own state or internationally have developed and expanded completely in the temporal, phenomenal world and go well beyond what even the old bronze age scriptures had written down. That&#039;s so 2 millenium ago!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can believe anything they want.  I can believe that Penelope Cruz is heartbroken I haven&#8217;t called her.  What you really need to ask is it true?  As scholars more worldly then me have stated for centuries, we do not have to prove that God does not exist, (can&#8217;t prove a negative).  What we need to do is have someone take the time to prove God does exist.  That is hypothesis that needs to be tested.  When there is proof of God&#8217;s existance (good luck finding any) then the dialogue can begin.  But so what, any social contract we have with others in our own state or internationally have developed and expanded completely in the temporal, phenomenal world and go well beyond what even the old bronze age scriptures had written down. That&#8217;s so 2 millenium ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imagin[ace]tion</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-54463</link>
		<dc:creator>Imagin[ace]tion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-54463</guid>
		<description>@Neil - Thats common. Phrases such as: &quot;Oh my god! &quot;or &quot;god damn it!&quot; or simply when in a defeated state for argument sakes: &quot;::sigh:: god...you&#039;re such an idiot&quot; - are all very common phrases that people have adapted into their speech. It doesn&#039;t indicate their religious preference. It is simply a product of socialization and peer interaction which produces such exclamations. Yet, if you look at Muslim raised individuals, I&#039;m sure you will not find many people who say &quot;oh my god!&quot; when frustrated or alarmed. Society shaped your behavior. USA is known for it&#039;s high-level of Christians, therefore, using &quot;god&quot; as a remark to show your uttmost alarm, anger, etc, then &#039;god&#039; (being infinite, supposably), seems to be a fitting use of application. I&#039;m an athiest and I also say &#039;oh my god&#039;. Guilty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neil &#8211; Thats common. Phrases such as: &#8220;Oh my god! &#8220;or &#8220;god damn it!&#8221; or simply when in a defeated state for argument sakes: &#8220;::sigh:: god&#8230;you&#8217;re such an idiot&#8221; &#8211; are all very common phrases that people have adapted into their speech. It doesn&#8217;t indicate their religious preference. It is simply a product of socialization and peer interaction which produces such exclamations. Yet, if you look at Muslim raised individuals, I&#8217;m sure you will not find many people who say &#8220;oh my god!&#8221; when frustrated or alarmed. Society shaped your behavior. USA is known for it&#8217;s high-level of Christians, therefore, using &#8220;god&#8221; as a remark to show your uttmost alarm, anger, etc, then &#8216;god&#8217; (being infinite, supposably), seems to be a fitting use of application. I&#8217;m an athiest and I also say &#8216;oh my god&#8217;. Guilty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-54374</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-54374</guid>
		<description>I have an atheist acquaintance who completely rejects any idea of Deity, but when things go pear-shaped, the first words out of her mouth are &#039;Oh my God!&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an atheist acquaintance who completely rejects any idea of Deity, but when things go pear-shaped, the first words out of her mouth are &#8216;Oh my God!&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-54273</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-54273</guid>
		<description>I may be agnostic about whether someone exists until I meet them. Then I become sure. That is what being a follower of Jesus is about - I&#039;ve experienced Jesus, seen his power at work, seen miracles - so I would be denying good evidence if I were to ignore it. Can I prove it? Only to myself. But the evidence puts it well beyond reasonable doubt for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be agnostic about whether someone exists until I meet them. Then I become sure. That is what being a follower of Jesus is about &#8211; I&#8217;ve experienced Jesus, seen his power at work, seen miracles &#8211; so I would be denying good evidence if I were to ignore it. Can I prove it? Only to myself. But the evidence puts it well beyond reasonable doubt for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-53723</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-53723</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the people who say things like &quot;I don&#039;t like the term &#039;atheist&#039; because it implies certainty.&quot;  If you feel that way, then I don&#039;t think that words means what you think it means.  Atheism is the lack of belief in gods (any of them) (that&#039;s it).  It doesn&#039;t imply, nor state, certainty of any kind it is only in regards to beliefs.  So you need to correct your definition of the word.
To take that one step further, I can honestly say, &quot;There are no gods.&quot;  In the same way I say &quot;there are no leprechauns/fairies/psychics/celestial teapots/etc.&quot;  There is the same amount of evidence for all of those...none.  I am also fully capable of changing my mind if proper evidence is presented. 
The I-don&#039;t-want-to-be-associated-with-the-word-atheist attitude is cowardly &amp; as defined, incorrect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the people who say things like &#8220;I don&#8217;t like the term &#8216;atheist&#8217; because it implies certainty.&#8221;  If you feel that way, then I don&#8217;t think that words means what you think it means.  Atheism is the lack of belief in gods (any of them) (that&#8217;s it).  It doesn&#8217;t imply, nor state, certainty of any kind it is only in regards to beliefs.  So you need to correct your definition of the word.<br />
To take that one step further, I can honestly say, &#8220;There are no gods.&#8221;  In the same way I say &#8220;there are no leprechauns/fairies/psychics/celestial teapots/etc.&#8221;  There is the same amount of evidence for all of those&#8230;none.  I am also fully capable of changing my mind if proper evidence is presented.<br />
The I-don&#8217;t-want-to-be-associated-with-the-word-atheist attitude is cowardly &amp; as defined, incorrect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pam</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-53688</link>
		<dc:creator>pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-53688</guid>
		<description>Labels, labels......too many labels. IMO, We should just do away entirely with the term agnostic. These people are just &quot;on the fence&quot;. Years ago someone once said to me, &quot;Be something, don&#039;t be Agnostic. Pick a side where your beliefs fall and go there.&quot; Well the wind (and there was barely a breeze) blew me over to the Atheists. I guess it&#039;s something I&#039;ve always known but just couldn&#039;t commit to for social or family reasons. I wonder if this is true for other Agnostics. I suspect so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labels, labels&#8230;&#8230;too many labels. IMO, We should just do away entirely with the term agnostic. These people are just &#8220;on the fence&#8221;. Years ago someone once said to me, &#8220;Be something, don&#8217;t be Agnostic. Pick a side where your beliefs fall and go there.&#8221; Well the wind (and there was barely a breeze) blew me over to the Atheists. I guess it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve always known but just couldn&#8217;t commit to for social or family reasons. I wonder if this is true for other Agnostics. I suspect so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-53666</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-53666</guid>
		<description>By atheism I mean, &quot;the doctrine or belief that there is no God&quot;, and by agnosticism I mean &quot;the disbelief in any claims of ultimate knowledge&quot;(both from Princeton). I very strongly doubt the existence of the spaghetti monster, and for all practical purposes I behave as if I believe it doesn&#039;t exist, of course. This is of more than a philosophical stance; humans have a tendency, or an emotional need for certainty, and I think our certainty is often premature. Once we have acquired a belief, we tend to ignore or distort data that don&#039;t fit that belief, and over- emphasize data that do fit our belief. &quot;My goal is to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about God alone, but agnosticism about everything. &quot; Robert Anton Wilson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By atheism I mean, &#8220;the doctrine or belief that there is no God&#8221;, and by agnosticism I mean &#8220;the disbelief in any claims of ultimate knowledge&#8221;(both from Princeton). I very strongly doubt the existence of the spaghetti monster, and for all practical purposes I behave as if I believe it doesn&#8217;t exist, of course. This is of more than a philosophical stance; humans have a tendency, or an emotional need for certainty, and I think our certainty is often premature. Once we have acquired a belief, we tend to ignore or distort data that don&#8217;t fit that belief, and over- emphasize data that do fit our belief. &#8220;My goal is to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about God alone, but agnosticism about everything. &#8221; Robert Anton Wilson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-53570</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-53570</guid>
		<description>Replace &quot;god&quot; by &quot;Father Christmas&quot; I&#039;m sure the majority reading this believed in Father Christmas at one time. Can anyone prove that Father Christmas does or does not exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replace &#8220;god&#8221; by &#8220;Father Christmas&#8221; I&#8217;m sure the majority reading this believed in Father Christmas at one time. Can anyone prove that Father Christmas does or does not exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julius</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/atheists/#comment-53569</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10601#comment-53569</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Torgwen (#5) on this one. Growing up, I also never &quot;got&quot; what others were feeling and telling me to feel. When people ask why I don&#039;t believe in any higher powers, I explain to them that I was born that way, as if the religion center in my brain is defaulted to its &quot;off&quot; position. As a rational person, I can analyze things and say there are probably no gods, but after 32 years of trusting my mind and my &quot;gut&quot;, it would take extraordinary evidence to change how I feel, and how I am hard- wired.

And numbers are subjective, questions are subjective. Certainly definitions of &quot;atheism&quot; and &quot;agnosticism&quot; are personally subjective. Numbers are fun, but they&#039;re not the whole story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Torgwen (#5) on this one. Growing up, I also never &#8220;got&#8221; what others were feeling and telling me to feel. When people ask why I don&#8217;t believe in any higher powers, I explain to them that I was born that way, as if the religion center in my brain is defaulted to its &#8220;off&#8221; position. As a rational person, I can analyze things and say there are probably no gods, but after 32 years of trusting my mind and my &#8220;gut&#8221;, it would take extraordinary evidence to change how I feel, and how I am hard- wired.</p>
<p>And numbers are subjective, questions are subjective. Certainly definitions of &#8220;atheism&#8221; and &#8220;agnosticism&#8221; are personally subjective. Numbers are fun, but they&#8217;re not the whole story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

