<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Physicists Working On X-Ray Vision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/physicists-working-xray-vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/physicists-working-xray-vision/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Taylor</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/physicists-working-xray-vision/#comment-53779</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10708#comment-53779</guid>
		<description>The light does go through the translucent material, but is scattered about, so when it comes out the photons are no longer ordered as they were when they went in (an exact spatial ordering of the photons is what we see as a clear picture). Think of frosted bathroom glass - light clearly passes through, but it doesn&#039;t come straight through - it gets scattered and bounced about, so the resulting image is just a big blur. The same is true of a translucent material, such as the foam sponge shown in the picture. 

Theoretically, it ought to be possible to unscramble these light patterns, to recover the original image. It may even be practical with something like bathroom glass, where the peturbations are at a fairly large scale. As for the sponge, I&#039;m doubtful they could measure it accurately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The light does go through the translucent material, but is scattered about, so when it comes out the photons are no longer ordered as they were when they went in (an exact spatial ordering of the photons is what we see as a clear picture). Think of frosted bathroom glass &#8211; light clearly passes through, but it doesn&#8217;t come straight through &#8211; it gets scattered and bounced about, so the resulting image is just a big blur. The same is true of a translucent material, such as the foam sponge shown in the picture. </p>
<p>Theoretically, it ought to be possible to unscramble these light patterns, to recover the original image. It may even be practical with something like bathroom glass, where the peturbations are at a fairly large scale. As for the sponge, I&#8217;m doubtful they could measure it accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nopke</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/physicists-working-xray-vision/#comment-53754</link>
		<dc:creator>Nopke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10708#comment-53754</guid>
		<description>Hm, an image or such would be even more enlightening, although .. the way this matrix works on this light ot make it go through opague materials .. might look not too enlightening .. although ..  Anyhow, bending the light .. making it go the way you want it to go .. at least, that&#039;s the picture I get from it.

Now, makes me think of people who can see through clothes .. hm .. how come ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, an image or such would be even more enlightening, although .. the way this matrix works on this light ot make it go through opague materials .. might look not too enlightening .. although ..  Anyhow, bending the light .. making it go the way you want it to go .. at least, that&#8217;s the picture I get from it.</p>
<p>Now, makes me think of people who can see through clothes .. hm .. how come ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roz</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/03/physicists-working-xray-vision/#comment-53750</link>
		<dc:creator>roz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=10708#comment-53750</guid>
		<description>sounds more like the light&#039;s going around, not thru.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds more like the light&#8217;s going around, not thru.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

