<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are Some People Smarter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/</link>
	<description>The official Derren Brown Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crae</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55365</link>
		<dc:creator>crae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55365</guid>
		<description>There is no such thing as &#039;smart&#039; and there is no such thing as &#039;intelligent&#039;. These concepts of the human brain are negative self limiting beliefs, and accept them without question at your own peril. I would even go so far as to say they are destructive.

The only concept of any relevance is training. Some people have trained their brains in better ways than other people. It&#039;s as simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as &#8216;smart&#8217; and there is no such thing as &#8216;intelligent&#8217;. These concepts of the human brain are negative self limiting beliefs, and accept them without question at your own peril. I would even go so far as to say they are destructive.</p>
<p>The only concept of any relevance is training. Some people have trained their brains in better ways than other people. It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephant's Child</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55336</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephant's Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55336</guid>
		<description>&#039;Another key factor is the insulating FATTY sheath encasing neuron fibres&#039;

Yet more proof that those on a low fat diet are not very bright.
Mmmmmm fat :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Another key factor is the insulating FATTY sheath encasing neuron fibres&#8217;</p>
<p>Yet more proof that those on a low fat diet are not very bright.<br />
Mmmmmm fat <img src='http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Guy</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55323</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55323</guid>
		<description>&quot;smarter brains seem to have more efficient networks between neurons – in other words, it takes fewer steps to relay a message between different regions of the brain&quot; does seem like an interesting theory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;smarter brains seem to have more efficient networks between neurons – in other words, it takes fewer steps to relay a message between different regions of the brain&#8221; does seem like an interesting theory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiderabc1</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55316</link>
		<dc:creator>spiderabc1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55316</guid>
		<description>I got a facebook IQ test result of over 140 though I know it&#039;s more to do with familar questions from team training and realizing the answer is often opposite like QI. I lack common sense at the best of times let alone apparent measurable intelligence, my brain must be in knots. I believe women have the brain tighter so the mass isn&#039;t less but looks smaller. I assume this for survival of the fittest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a facebook IQ test result of over 140 though I know it&#8217;s more to do with familar questions from team training and realizing the answer is often opposite like QI. I lack common sense at the best of times let alone apparent measurable intelligence, my brain must be in knots. I believe women have the brain tighter so the mass isn&#8217;t less but looks smaller. I assume this for survival of the fittest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Claire</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55313</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55313</guid>
		<description>I suppose this goes to show that it&#039;s not what you&#039;ve got, but what you do with it &amp; how you use it that matters.

LC x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose this goes to show that it&#8217;s not what you&#8217;ve got, but what you do with it &amp; how you use it that matters.</p>
<p>LC x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55312</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55312</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read The Talent Code but it sounds fascinating. Does he disucss at all child prodigies, such as Mozart, who surely would not have had time to develop the skills they displayed at such a young age through repitition alone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read The Talent Code but it sounds fascinating. Does he disucss at all child prodigies, such as Mozart, who surely would not have had time to develop the skills they displayed at such a young age through repitition alone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roz</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55311</link>
		<dc:creator>roz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55311</guid>
		<description>that better be a picture of derren&#039;s hand...if youse guys are smart...  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that better be a picture of derren&#8217;s hand&#8230;if youse guys are smart&#8230;  <img src='http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55304</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55304</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, as any comment on cognitive function intrinsically is. However, it doesn&#039;t seem to offer any further incite into brain development than that available in established biological and psychological texts. Gerald Edelman&#039;s work on neural plasticity is enlightening, particularly Neural Darwinism, if you can get past his slightly florid style. A wealth of other writers also offer authoriative comment on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, as any comment on cognitive function intrinsically is. However, it doesn&#8217;t seem to offer any further incite into brain development than that available in established biological and psychological texts. Gerald Edelman&#8217;s work on neural plasticity is enlightening, particularly Neural Darwinism, if you can get past his slightly florid style. A wealth of other writers also offer authoriative comment on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC Ngok</title>
		<link>http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2010/04/people-smarter/#comment-55293</link>
		<dc:creator>MC Ngok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/?p=11310#comment-55293</guid>
		<description>Daniel Coyle&#039;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Talent-Code-Greatness-Born-Grown/dp/055380684X&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Talent Code&lt;/a&gt;&quot; is pretty much entirely about the sheaths (myelin) and how its buildup affects performance. His thesis is that talent is an illusion, and that&#039;s its entirely a result of repetition in practice building up layers of myelin around important connections in the brain. Pretty interesting book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Coyle&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Talent-Code-Greatness-Born-Grown/dp/055380684X" rel="nofollow">The Talent Code</a>&#8221; is pretty much entirely about the sheaths (myelin) and how its buildup affects performance. His thesis is that talent is an illusion, and that&#8217;s its entirely a result of repetition in practice building up layers of myelin around important connections in the brain. Pretty interesting book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

