
“Forced to wait for fifteen minutes at the airport luggage carousel leaves many of us miserable and irritated. Yet if we’d spent the same waiting time walking to the carousel we’d be far happier. That’s according to Christopher Hsee and colleagues, who say we’re happier when busy but that unfortunately our instinct is for idleness. Unless we have a reason for being active we choose to do nothing – an evolutionary vestige that ensures we conserve energy.
Consider Hsee’s first study. His team offered 98 students a choice between delivering a completed questionnaire to a location that was a 15-minute round-trip walk away, or delivering it just outside the room and then waiting 15 minutes. A twist was that either the same or different types of chocolate snack bar were offered as a reward at the two locations.
If the same snack bar was offered at both locations then the majority (68 per cent) of students chose the lazy option, delivering the questionnaire just outside the room. By contrast, if a different (black vs. white) bar was offered at each location then the majority (59 per cent) chose the far away ‘busy’ option. This was the case even though earlier research showed both snack bar options were equally appealing, and even though the location of the two snack bar types was counterbalanced across participants. In other words, Hsee said, the students’ instinct was for idleness, but when they were given a specious excuse for walking further, most of them took the busy option. Crucially, when asked afterwards, the students who’d taken the walk reported feeling significantly happier than the idle students, consistent with Hsee’s theory that we’re happier when busy (a repeat of the study in which students were allocated without choice to the idle or busy condition led to the same outcome – the busier students felt happier).”
Read more at BPS Research Digest (Thanks @moonylein)



“The researchers proceed to argue that, unfortunately, most people will not be tempted by futile busyness, so there’s a paternalistic case for governments and organisations tricking us into more activity:”
i guess FDR was onto something…
So we are geared to be idle, but as your later post points out if we stay idle for too long each day we’ll die younger.
No wonder I like driving around town from home to work and back, even though I live 10 minutes away from the office. And it’s 10 minutes both driving and walking (there’s a pedestrian shortcut that I can’t take with my car), yet I choose to drive, and I choose to drive for 30 minutes, rather than take the direct path.
Now I have an excuse for being wasteful: I’m happy afterwards, and while until now it was just my gut feeling, now science says it for me too
This is science, right?
Hahahaha ….. My oh my … I keep wondering why those researchers wont to see such a primal drive as the complete human being … (or animal being). Maybe they theirselves recognize theirselves in the image they put out there.
There is no status quo in me, so whatever they will say about my state today, or this minute .. it will not be the same tomorrow or later today. Preferences keep changing.
Energy can be worked in many ways .. not just by being idle. For some that will consume a whole lot of energy .. due to their annoyance .. it will fuck up the balance inside .. and will have a negative outcome ..
If we’re on the prowl .. we dont want to wait … We do like our prey to be idle though …
It does not make sense .. this reasoning backwards .. of science ..