Comments on: Through The Wormhole – Is Time Travel Possible?

By: rawr

rawr — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:00:52 +0000

Time travel*

By: rawr

rawr — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:00:20 +0000

Your amatuers they always knew tim travel was possible

By: Cinta

Cinta — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:19:56 +0000

I have always believed that some day they could travel in time, according to quantum physics paradox would not exist because it would create another timeline, another parallel universe almost identical. It would be something like a tree with infinite branches. And this would explain why we have never … matched time travelers, and that if there are infinite worlds is infinitely branching difficult match any traveler, but not impossible.

By: Art S.

Art S. — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:11:59 +0000

Here’s one for the stoners. Maybe the UFO’s that have been reported over the years are actually time machines and the inhabitants are actually us coming back to tell everyone to chill out because, “look at what we’ve evolved into”!!!

By: David Rotherham

David Rotherham — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:59:32 +0000

Long ago, I read a short sci-fi story which pointed out the catch to time travel: The space- time exchange rate is “c”, so a single second of time travel would equate to three-quarters of the way to the moon, and you would never have the time or energy to get any significant way into the past or future.

By: Rob

Rob — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:56:29 +0000

Scott- DMT has given me many great experiences, including what seemed like time travel, but that is only from my perspective. The brain is a complex organ that creates an illusion of perception. It is not real time travel, at least not IMHO.
I could be wrong.
But I don’t think so.
ps no more psychedelics for me, got to be a responsible adult type person…

By: Rob

Rob — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:50:55 +0000

Waterbottle – that is my reasoning too. Well put.

By: Lady Claire

Lady Claire — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:18:45 +0000

I just think that, even if it was at all possible, once you start messing about with time etc, you’re asking for trouble.

LC x

By: Waterbottle

Waterbottle — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:33:53 +0000

I’ve always thought that if it is possible to travel back in time, then doing so has to split the time line in two. So, the time traveler doesn’t affect his own time but rather a new time line. This would both explain why we haven’t run into any time travelers yet and prevent the grandfather paradox from occurring.

By: Evert

Evert — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:22:36 +0000

“With no time travel in the past then how could you assume there will be in the future. That is if no-one makes up a silly rule of not travel back in time before the machine was built, to insure safety.”

That may be a law of nature, not a silly rule mankind would make up (there will always be people breaking those rules anyway). If entanglement is the way to go, a time machine wouldn’t be a vehicle but it would be a device that sends and receives information. In order to send information to the past there would need to be a time machine capable of receiving the information, meaning you cannot go back to before the time machine was built.