“Sick of chasing down climate denialists himself, Nigel Leck put his programming skills to use for him. He created the Twitter bot @AI_AGW, who also goes by the name “Turing Test.” Every five minutes the bot searches Twitter for tweets relating to climate change denialism, and automatically responds to the posters using a database of hundreds of rebuttals, which include links to information and videos. Christopher Mims at Technology Review talked to Leck about the project: “The database began as a simple collection of responses written by Leck himself, but these days quite a few of the rejoinders are culled from a university source whom Leck says he isn’t at liberty to divulge.”
Some of @AI_AGW’s debates have gone on for hours or days, with the recipient not knowing they are talking to a bot, even though its handle says AI and it includes a link to the Wikipedia page on the Turing test. The program is smart enough to run through a list of responses, which is especially helpful when debating with people who keep throwing the same arguments at you time after time.
Leck has seen all different kinds of responses to the bot, but most fall into two categories, he told Mims:
“If [the chatbot] actually argues them into a corner, it tends to be two crowds out there,” says Leck. “There’s the guns and God crowd, and their parting shot will be ‘God created it that way’ or something like that. I don’t know how you answer that.” The second crowd, Leck says, are skeptics so unyielding they won’t be swayed by any amount of argumentation.”
Read more at Discover Magazine (Thanks @powerofstrange)
I think he’s forgotten to add the “RT” to the bot so everyone’s tweets are just being @replied with what they already said? That’s what I’ve gathered after looking through a few tweets….
Oh crap.. I just realised it’s more intelligent than that.. That looks pretty awesome. Smart robot.
It had a go at me, but I stopped when I said I was using actual research data.
Someone should create a similar bot to answer Young Earth Creationists.
That is very clever. I commend you.
I don’t really care about climate change, but I do feel that people caught using bots on Twitter should be banned.
@Skullet
Please let that be satire. If it is, it’s very funny.
Oh and a general point…not sure I like their use of the word ‘skeptic’ at the end. I know it’s probably semantically correct, but I think a better use in this case would be to say:
“The second crowd, Leck says, are people so skeptical so unyielding they won’t be swayed by any amount of argumentation.”
that should say ‘it stopped’!
Proof that you are a tool that blindly accepts “facts” from Fox “news”: Arguing with a bot for several hours without realizing that it’s a bot.
Right, my bait is on twitter, now I play the waiting game….
Dear AI, Is your understanding of this matter 100% infallibly correct?
If yes, why are you experiencing difficulty in communicating the same proof that was needed to convince you?
If no, which part or parts of your understanding of this matter are incorrect?
Al.