BLOG
RISING CHORUS OF ALARM FROM CHURCH LEADERS AT “AGGRESSIVE SECULARISM”.

Posted in Blog Archive

Posted by abeodbart February 27, 2009 at 10:54 pm


There’s been a rising chorus of alarm from church leaders at what they regard as the “aggressive secularism” marginalising Christianity, the religion whose precepts – such as “do as you would be done by”, and upholding the sanctity of human life – once underpinned British laws.

A few years ago, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, warned that “Christianity had been all but vanquished in Britain” as the underpinning for the nation’s moral life.

The Church complains that recent legislation – such as the laws guaranteeing equal treatment for gay people that forced Catholic adoption agencies to place children with homosexual couples – seek to control people’s morals as well as their behaviour.

BBC

COMMENTS
February 27, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Elise says:

I saw Milk the other day. That last paragraph just reminded me of the movie…extremists make me throw up.


February 27, 2009 at 11:23 pm
Berber Anna says:

“Do as you would be done by”, but if you’re different, don’t think you have any sort of equal rights. What do they call that again? Oh yeah. Hypochristianity.


February 27, 2009 at 11:33 pm
Diana says:

This is my personal opinion. It is very interesting that people almost always target Christianity, but tend to forget Islam and Judaism. If Christianity is a faith meant to control moral behavior then what of Islam and Judaism?

Quite frankly, I would prefer to live in world, where murdering someone was wrong, where treating and loving others as you would do yourself is an aim in life. Where you could actually trust people with your kids, and not worry that someone is going to try and con you out of your money. Very “idealistic”, I know.

However, heaven forbid, we lived in world where you could do as you like, no laws, no morals, no love. Our society would disintegrate completely.

I am not saying Christians or anyone with faith is superior to anyone else. I have met a few so called “Christians” I would rather kick in the eye. On the other hand I have met many Christians and people who have faith who done so much for society. The world is a better place because of them.


February 27, 2009 at 11:36 pm
Diana says:

p.s Please excuse me for the atrocious punctution and spelling errors in the previous post.


February 27, 2009 at 11:55 pm
Elise says:

Diana: well, sure, I agree. I actually have morals, love for other people, I try to be a good person (to my own standards) and I think that murder is a bad thing etc… you can have those and be an agnostic, like me.

I just hate extremists (of all kind). And not giving people the same rights as you just because they are gay (or black, or female, or….) IS extremist and doesn’t show a lot of “Christian” morals, I think.


February 28, 2009 at 1:46 am
ScreamingGreenConure says:

I don’t think anyone is forgetting Judaism or Islam. There was a lot of controversy with shariah arbitration being introduced into the UK recently, was there not?
This article seems to confuse “secular” and “atheist,” in that they think the number of people identifyijng as atheists is important when considering how secular society is. It’s perfectly possible for a religious person to support the idea of a secular society.


February 28, 2009 at 2:41 am
Ken says:

A morale centre comes form a centered person not a set of arbitrary rules in a book and enforced and collective compliance enforced by fear and threats!

I am a more morale than most christians I know. I like to live and let live…I dont do it with the exception of gays, muslims, or anyone who disagrees with me.

I am sick of religious leaders thinking they are the only ones in this country who have morales when they are living around 60 to 1500 years behind the rest of us!


February 28, 2009 at 2:44 am
Ken says:

I have noticed that the word moral has been spellchecked as Morale in my last post…thought I would point it out before anyone else did.

Tsk!
:-)


February 28, 2009 at 5:20 am
Berber Anna says:

If people need a book and an angry father-figure in the sky to keep them from harming others, I don’t think they were very ‘moral’ to begin with.

We’ve evolved as a social species, so certain moral codes (murdering, raping, stealing and general harmful-to-others forms of behaviour are wrong) are more or less ingrained in us. Which is probably why they’re in the codes/laws of a lot of religions in the first place.
Those elementary rules are a good thing. The arbitrary ones, like exclusion of lbgt people (probably originally a ‘please breed more believers’ thing, I’d think), or the whole ‘magic is evil, let’s ban Harry Potter’ mindset, are what I can’t get behind. Strange, superstitious, outdated rules that aren’t there to avoid harm, but seemingly for no other reason than to create an ‘us vs them’ feeling — those are what I dislike about certain religions.


February 28, 2009 at 7:02 am
Tash says:

We don’t really need religion – because there are laws in place to prevent thins happenning that deal out punishment if broken – and what right have the church got to stop equal rights for gay people – if they were to think about what they were saying – then they would realsie they were contridicting thereselves – they say god loves everyone – and something like don’t judge thy neighbour. In the old testament (if i remember correctly from R.S GCSE) it says that a man can divorce his wife but not visa versa – well they didnt moan about that when that got updated so why now when everything is modern do they have to be living in the past with a book that they can’t really prove is real – its about as real as harry potter to people in 10,000 yrs time. My partner has this theory (- which i’m not entirely sure but i’ll write down anyway) that in a 1000 years or so when we have the technology to go around the sun that it may have already happenned and when they did it last time it went wrong and they ended up back in BC – but this time making it BC because one of the astronaughts became pregnant – he says ‘they’re halos opened’ – space helmets, they preformed miracles – paracetamal – in BC the things that we have now would be miraculous. He reckons to that Mary and Joeseph are english american names not (i can’t remember where jesus was born) native of that country names. That’s my partners opinion not mine – i just thought it was interesting. If that was true and the bible was never written i wonder what it would be like today – as it did pay an important part in history with Henry 8th but i think now with all the proof against it they need to stop preaching and picking on gay people, parents who are unwed etc – its modern days now. Thank god they don’t get listened to so much now – otherwise a lot of us would be hung.

Sorry – that’s my rant against the church for today.


February 28, 2009 at 8:33 am
Katherine says:

The first step towards a truly secular society would be to remove all faith schools. Faith schools artificially divide children from each other at a young age and are an anachronism in the 21st century. If parents wish to teach their child about a particular religion then this can easily be done at home. If anyone is interested in this issue there are currently two petitions to be signed on the Prime Ministers No 10 website asking for the abolition of collective worship in schools and the complete abolition of all faith schools.

Don’t think Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor should be complaining this week really since he has just been given a seat in the House of Lords: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5811976.ece


February 28, 2009 at 11:57 am
faye says:

Religon does not create morals, people create them for themselves. You don’t need to be religious to be a “good” person, goodness comes from the actions you perform each day.


February 28, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Nopke says:

It’s not religion that is needed, it is the awareness of people regarding theirselves and others that is needed. To be and held responsible for own behaviour and actions. Stronger punishment for those who dont obey this normal rule when it comes to having comitted crime and such.
And as for adoption and such … good screening of all couples is quite normal I think. The fact that others can have childeren without being screened may some think that they are entitled to this as well, but I myself would be more in favor for a screening for all, not just those who wish to adopt, although this is something that will never happen. People get childeren just as easy sometimes as having a new car or such, even more easy than a new pet. As it is such a natural thing apparently … something you should not think about … which they theirselves regret afterwards way too often.

Anyhow .. religion can never be in charge of modern world. Realistic views are necessary, Lots of religions are not realistic at all. I’d prefer them to keep it at home,or inside and use it in a good way to boost/stimulate theirselves to live in this realistic world.
Life is too hard to put all faith in religion .. put some faith in yourself I’d say. And open your eyes. Dreaming is not for daily life. The believers quite often do, although the church leaders don’t .. they have other goals and do look different upon religion, use it for their own wordly goals. As it has been from the old days on already. Let alone a few here and there. The ones who use it in a good way are not the ones I refer to. I aim for the best inside myself as well, in favor of a better world.


March 1, 2009 at 2:21 pm
Berber Anna says:

Tash: Your partner’s theory would make a very readable SF story, I think, but it’s linguistically faulty. The reason Mary and Joseph sound like English names is that they are the English translation of the Biblical names Meryam and Yosef (which were perfectly ordinary Hebrew names at that time). In my native language, Dutch, they’re translated as Maria and Josef, and there’s probably many more translations out there.
It’s interesting that the translation issue doesn’t occur to many people, though. I’ve read about people saying things like ‘if English was good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for me’ as an argument for not learning any foreign languages…


March 2, 2009 at 11:18 am
manigen says:

Berber Anna said: “I’ve read about people saying things like “if English was good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for me” as an argument for not learning any foreign languages”

And then they go on to argue that the only true bible is the King James, and they don’t care what some old greek bible said.


STORE

New and exclusive items



FEATURED Infamous Brochure

Infamous Brochure
FIND OUT MORE
FIND OUT MORE