Yesterday
Yesterday, first-hand, I saw Twitter achieve two apparent results for civility. In the morning, I posted a tweet drawing attention to an online report of a tube official seemingly humiliating an elderly passenger who had his arm caught in a door. A little while later I RTd (‘re-tweeted’: passed on) Charlie Broker’s strongly-worded thoughts on Jan Moir’s unpleasant article of dailymailia. The latter was then picked up by Stephen Fry, and by the end of the day it had gained such widespread awareness that both stories had made the evening news. The tube official was investigated under pressure from Boris Johnson and received a suspension, and Moir issued a statement saying she was a victim of an orchestrated campaign.
Moir’s interpretation was wrong, and betrays a misguided notion about the nature of Twitter and similar forms of networking. There is no orchestration – just the rapid spread of information. Tweets (posts) are passed on, word gets around, and when a Twitter giant like Stephen Fry mentions it, a million people hear and many pass it on themselves. The response to Moir’s article came from areas much further than the Twittersphere, and although the accusation made was one of homophobia, her critics were not defined by sexuality. Ads were withdrawn from her online article, a strong critical voice was heard, and the Daily Mail became mortal for half a day. If the Mail exists to motivate the small-minded complaining communities of outraged middle England, for once it had a clear voice of outrage hurled back at it.
I hope that the tube official was fairly investigated and deserves his suspension. And that the complaints lodged against Moir have a worthwhile effect. As vast numbers shun print and turn to the net for their news, yesterday sounded an interesting note: an infamous newspaper held to account by a sharp, informed, conscientious public. It may even be a first. I did not know Gately, but there was time when he feared the press ‘outing’ him. If his passing has caused this familiar form of mawkish, snide journalism to be held to account, then perhaps we could see that as a tribute to him. And to the astonishing impact of Twitter, and the shared decency of its users.
DBx
@ Codifier – oops, my post went missing there. Yeh, exactly. We have to BLAND in!
@Carol – I thought that was Wolfy in Citizen Smith?? lol 😉
LC x
Thank you Derren. Very few people would do something about the horrendous attitudes and opinions people have. To have brought this nationwide disgust about Moir’s article to the forefront is a remarkable achievement.
I’m glad i had a public outlet, to voice my horror at such an article. if twitter and social networking didnt exist, i would have been left chunnering under my breath about it and getting angry without anyway of doing something about it.
The comments made by Moir in her article and in her following statement make me sick to my stomach, and i told the PCC this. I will keep my fingers crossed that Moir doesnt get away with this
@JayKay… I do not like pack mentality.
Me neither. As much as Moir’s piece was distastefully homophobic I’m not sure if that or the boil her in oil rhetoric that followed bothers me most….
Colston…
Beautiful….just beautiful.
I don’t pretend to know about stuff like this. The furthest my mind stretches is next Friday before it’s rebuffed by A-Levels and music and… well that’s about it, actually… But I saw this and decided to do a bit of further reading.
But to be honest, I’m compelled to point out how admirable it is that in a time where society leans ever closer to individualism, and accepting that that is the way the world works, end of, that there are people still willing to say what they think, something I’m rarely guilty of, but admire nonetheless.
GB
” As vast numbers shun print and turn to the net for their news, yesterday sounded an interesting note: an infamous newspaper held to account by a sharp, informed, conscientious public”
Get a grip man; even those who do NOT have to use the net for their news could ascertain that the piece in the Mail was so, so wrong. Those that “Tweet” do not have the “sharp informed conscientious public” gig sewn up!
@ sharon @ jackqueenking – 🙂
The early morning TV news has just reported on Jan Moir’s article calling it “malicious and damagingâ€. Naturally, Jan Moir is denying any malicious intention….yeah right..but well done to DB and everyone who made this possible.
The furore about the Moir article was right in my opinion. Whilst some people can either ignore the newspaper, or ignore the apparently homophobic journalist, the truth is that some people do allow this type of sentiment to seep into their thinking. That’s why it’s so dangerous.
My partner is a professional working with young adults who have experienced bullying and abuse as young gay men. In the last decade a great deal has been done to protect religions beliefs and ethnic background but there is precious little that deals with homophobia. The article would not have been published if it had been highlighting religious views.
It seems that everyone is feeling a little bit guilty now and taking a step backward – see Stephen Fry’s comments http://www.stephenfry.com/2009/10/19/poles-politeness-and-politics-in-the-age-of-twitter/
Sign the no 10 Downing Street Petition to make the PCC a Public Body!
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/makePCCPublic/
Following the article in the Daily Mail on Friday 16th October by Jan Moir in relation to the death of Stephen Gately, the PCC received over 21,000 complaints; however the chairman the Code committee for the PCC is currently the editor of the Daily Mail Paul Dacre.
As the formula one boss Max Mosley said when giving evidence to the culture, media and sport committee at the House of Commons “”It’s like putting the mafia in charge of the local police station. You can’t let them regulate themselves.”
The PCC was weakened by preferential treatment to the newspaper industry and it lacked suffic
Perhaps your friend Stephen Fry would care to acknowledge and apologise for his own tripe- blaming the Poles for Auschwitz. Trumps anything the ghastly Daily Fail have come up with. People in glass houses etc.
Stephen Fry is a great man and much more intelligent than a lot of us. Besides, if you read the article more clearly, he very lightly suggested it, he didn’t actually blame the Poles for starting Aushwitz. You are suggesting he directly blamed the Poles, when in actual fact, he said:
“Let’s face it, there has been a history in Poland of right-wing Catholicism, which has been deeply disturbing for those of us who know a little history, and remember which side of the border Auschwitz was on.”
I’m sorry but to me that isn’t physically blaming the Poles for it. Still, your opinion, and everyone’s opinions differ from time to time.
Besides, in Stephen Fry’s favour, his statement was probably in response to the Poles calling homosexuals “fags.” Everyone is entitled to choose their sexuality and just because homosexuality differs from what has been classed as ‘right’ for so long doesn’t mean that they should receive such cruel and demeaning feedback. Anyway, homosexuality has had it’s fair share of criticism and crude remarks in the past and still receives it unjustifiably today. I’d be pretty annoyed if people questionned by sexuality because it differs from what is typically ‘the norm.’ It’s awful people can’t have a same sex relationship without being judged.
A definite win for the sensible majority, hurrah for Twitter!
The formula one boss Max Mosley said when giving evidence to the culture, media and sport committee at the House of Commons “â€It’s like putting the mafia in charge of the local police station. You can’t let them regulate